<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SQL Server database design &#8211; Moving table to new filegroups	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 07:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christophe Cosme		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Cosme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3217&quot;&gt;rusdi&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Rusdi, 
well if you have data that you didn&#039;t transfer to your new partitioned table (for archiving purpose for instance) and you can still access this table. If you need to combine both data source from your older table and the new partitioned one you can create select statement using union all. If you need this on a regular basis I suggest you create a view to combine both tables using the union all statement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3217">rusdi</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Rusdi,<br />
well if you have data that you didn&#8217;t transfer to your new partitioned table (for archiving purpose for instance) and you can still access this table. If you need to combine both data source from your older table and the new partitioned one you can create select statement using union all. If you need this on a regular basis I suggest you create a view to combine both tables using the union all statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rusdi		</title>
		<link>https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rusdi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dbi-services.com/blog/sql-server-database-design-moving-table-to-new-filegroups/#comment-3217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thanks for sharing,
after we move data fo partitioning, how if we generate report that need data from older partitioning?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing,<br />
after we move data fo partitioning, how if we generate report that need data from older partitioning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)

Served from: www.dbi-services.com @ 2026-08-15 12:09:46 by W3 Total Cache
-->