Comments on: Deploying 11.2.0.4 on a recent ODA

By: JustAnotherODAadmin

JustAnotherODAadmin — Thu, 27 Feb 2025 19:58:17 +0000

The first option above doesn’t work, at least not in 19.25. Looks life they’ve caught on…
DCS-10024:Input parameter ‘DbVersion’ contains unacceptable value ‘11.2.0.4.210119’. Allowed values are ‘[19.25.0.0.241015, 19.24.0.0.240716, 19.23.0.0.240416, 19.22.0.0.240116, 19.21.0.0.231017, 19.20.0.0.230718, 19.19.0.0.230418, 19.18.0.0.230117, 19.17.0.0.221018]’.

By: Jérôme Dubar

Jérôme Dubar — Tue, 28 Jan 2025 13:44:11 +0000

In reply to Bruno. Hello Bruno, datafiles are located in ASM on DB Systems, and visible from the bare metal. If you create a kind of DB System with application VMs, you will have to create vDisks and classic Linux filesystems on top of that. It may be less efficient compared to ASM. But let's be clear: if you come from an old system running an outdated 11g, it would probably run faster on an ODA X10/X11 even from an application VM...

By: Bruno

Bruno — Tue, 28 Jan 2025 08:34:48 +0000

Hello
You’re talking about performance.
Databases in DB Systems are therefore supposed to be more efficient than those in application VMs.
I imagine this is related to storage.
The storage access mode must be different in the two cases. Do you have more details on this subject?

By: Thecoolgambler

Thecoolgambler — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 05:11:39 +0000

So are we saying it’s technically possible to run db 11g on ODA. I have someone who absolutely can’t upgrade their db 11.2.0.1.0 and forms 6i, and they want to order ODA X10